Competitive analysis of soybean and sudangrass using replacement series design

Autores

  • Mauro Antonio Rizzardi
  • Alana Cristina Dorneles Wandscheer
  • Hoffmann Ferreira Andrea

Palavras-chave:

Sorghum sudanense (Piper) Stapf, Glycine max (L.) Merr, competição, planta daninha.

Resumo

Competition is the best known form of direct interference of weeds on agricultural crops. However, there is relatively
little information on the competition of the weed sudangrass on soybean, which has been common in agricultural areas
in the southern of Rio Grande do Sul. The objective of this study was to evaluate the competition between sudangrass
and soybeans using replacement series experiments. The experiment was carried out in a greenhouse in a completely
randomized design with four replications. The treatments consisted of soybean and sudangrass associations. The
experimental units were 8-L plastic pots, in the proportions 0: 8, 2: 6, 4: 4, 6: 2, 8: 0, corresponding to 0, 25, 50, 75 and 100%
of the crop and weed respectively. Shoot, root and total dry matter and plant height were analyzed through diagrams
applied to replacement series and competitive indices. Soybean showed competitive superiority in coexistence with
sudangrass in relation to shoot, root and total dry matter. The intraspecific competition was more significant for the crop
and inter-specific competition was more important for the weed.

Referências

Agostinetto D, Rigoli RP, Galon L, Moraes PVD de, & Fontana LC (2009) Competitividade relativa da soja em convivência com papuã (Brachiaria plantaginea). Scientia Agraria, 10:185-190.

Berger U, Piou C, Schiffers, Grimm V (2008) Competition among plants: concepts, individual-based modeling approaches, and a proposal for a future research strategy. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 9:121-135.

Bianchi M.A, Fleck NG, Lamego FP (2006) Proporção entre plantas de soja e plantas competidoras e as relações de interferência mútua. Ciência Rural, 36:1380-1387.

Bittebiere AK, Mony C, Clément B, Garbey M (2012) Modeling competition between plants using an individual based model: methods and effects on the growth of two species with contrasted growth forms. Ecological Modelling, 234:p.38-50.

Christoffoleti PJ, Victoria Filho R (1996) Efeitos da densidade e proporção de plantas de milho (Zea mays L.) e caruru (Amaranthus retroflexus L.) em competição. Planta Daninha, 14:42-47.

Cousens R (1991) Aspects of the design and interpretation of competition (interference) experiments. Weed Technology, 5:664-673.

Dias-Filho MB (2006) Competição e sucessão vegetal em pastagens. Belém, PA: Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. 38p. (Documentos Online, 240).

Fleck NG, Agostinetto D, Galon L, Schaedler CE (2008) Competitividade relativa entre cultivares de arroz irrigado e biótipo de arroz-vermelho. Planta Daninha, 26:101-111.

Fontana LC, Markus C, Polidoro E, Oliveira C de, Westendorff N da R, Agostinetto D (2010) Interferência entre soja (Glycine max) e milhã (Digitaria ciliaris). In: Congresso de Iniciação Científica, Pelotas. Anais, UFPel.

Hoffman ML, Buhler DD (2002) Utilizing Sorghum as a functional model of crop-weed competition. I. Establishing a competitive hierarchy. Weed Science, 50:466-472.

Kissmann KG (1997) Plantas infestantes e nocivas. 2ª ed. São Paulo, BASF Brasileira S.A..825p.

Moraes PVD, Agostinetto D, Galon L, Rigoli LP (2009) Competitividade relativa de soja com arroz-vermelho. Planta Daninha, 27:35-40.

Nisensohn L, Tuesca D, Faccini D, Puricelli E, Vitta J (2011) Factores biológicos que determinan la competencia de Commelina erecta con otras malezas em sistemas de cultivo. Planta Daninha, 29:97-106.

Passini T (2001) Competitividade e predição de perdas de rendimento da cultura de feijão quando em convivência com Brachiaria plantaginea (Link) Hitchc. Tese Doutorado. Escola Superior de Agricultura “Luiz de Queiroz”, Piracicaba. 130p.

Radosevich SR, Holt JS, Ghersa CM (1997) Plant-plant associations. In: Radosevich SR, Holt JS, Ghersa CM Ecology of weeds and invasive plants: relationship to agriculture and natural resource management. 3ª ed. New Jersey, John Wiley & Sons. 454p.

Rigoli RP, Agostinetto D, Schaedler CE, Dal Magro T, Tironi S (2008) Habilidade competitiva relativa do trigo (Triticum aestivum) em convivência com azevém (Lolium multiflorum) ou nabo (Raphanus raphanistrum). Planta Daninha, 26:93-100.

Rizzardi MA, Fleck NG, Vidal RA, Merotto Jr A, Agostinetto D (2001) Competição por recursos do solo entre ervas daninhas e culturas. Ciência Rural, 31:707-714.

Rizzardi MA, Roman ES, Borowski DZ, Marcon R (2004) Interferência de populações de Euphorbia heterophylla e Ipomoea ramosissima isoladas ou em misturas sobre a cultura de soja. Planta Daninha, 22:29-34.

Roush ML, Radosevich SR, Wagner RG, Maxwell BD, Petersen TD (1989) A comparison of methods for measuring effects of density and proportion in plant competition experiments. Weed Science, 37:268-275.

Vargas L, Peixoto CM, Roman ES (2006) Manejo de plantas daninhas na cultura do milho. Passo Fundo, Embrapa Trigo. 20p. (Documentos Online, 61).

Zanine A de M, Santos EM (2004) Competição entre espécies de plantas – uma revisão. Revista da FZVA, 11:10-30.

Downloads

Publicado

2016-11-18

Como Citar

Rizzardi, M. A., Wandscheer, A. C. D., & Andrea, H. F. (2016). Competitive analysis of soybean and sudangrass using replacement series design. Revista Ceres, 63(5). Recuperado de https://ojs.ceres.ufv.br/ceres/article/view/1324

Edição

Seção

PRODUÇÃO VEGETAL

Artigos mais lidos pelo mesmo(s) autor(es)