Impact of leaf age on common fig susceptibility to rust caused by Cerotelium fici

Autores

  • José Roberto Vieira-Júnior CNPAT
  • Silvaldo Felipe da Silveira UENF
  • Ana Beatriz Vieira-Faria MAPA
  • Luciana Aparecida Rodrigues UENF
  • Luiz Carlos Santos Caetano INCAPER

Palavras-chave:

Ficus caricae, rust epidemic, epidemiology, infection and latent period, leaf abscission

Resumo

Rust caused by Cerotelium fici leads to significant defoliation in common fig trees (Ficus carica). However, studies on its epidemiology remain scarce. The aim of the present study is to investigate common fig rust progress in leaves inoculated at different ages over two growing seasons (dry and rainy) in an experimental fig orchard. Artificially inoculated leaves and those exposed to natural infection showed more severe rust symptoms when they were inoculated earlier - up to 45 days after leaf emergence. Disease severity and leaf longevity (in days) were inversely and directly proportional to leaf age at inoculation time, respectively. Leaves inoculated at earlier presented significantly higher disease progression rates based on number of pustules per cm², broader area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC) recorded for pustule density and higher maximum severity, which was visually estimated as the percentage of lesioned leaf area. Inoculated young leaves abscised 40 to 60 days earlier than the uninoculated leaves, which were protected from natural infection by plastic bags. The uninoculated leaves remained attached to the plants from 90 to 100 days. These findings highlight apical sprouts as primary targets for protective fungicide applications, which must be more intense at early growing season in order control rust in common fig crops.

Referências

Meghwall PR, Kumar P. Common fig cultivation in Indian arid zone. 2009; Intensive Agric, Oct-Dec, p.20-26.

Singh A, Kishore K, Kumar P, Khape PS, Mishra DS, Singh D, et al. Phenological growth and development stages of commong fig (Ficus carica L.). Folia Hortic [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2025 Jan 31]; 35:395-402. Available from: http://doi.org/10.2478/fhort-2023-0028 doi: 10.2478/fhort-2023-0028

IBGE - Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística - Anuário Estatístico do Brasil [Internet]. Rio de Janeiro, RJ; c2023. [cited 2024 Jun 2]. Available from: http://www.ibge.gov.br/explica/producao-agropecuaria/figo/br

Caetano LC, Guarçoni MA, Lima IM, Ventura JA. Recomendações técnicas para a cultura da figueira. Instituto Capixaba de Pesquisa, Assistência Técnica e Extensão Rural Incaper; 2012 May. Report No.: 203.

Czaja EA, Zeviani WM, Dalla Pria M. Monocycle components of fig rust comparing in vivo and ex vivo methodology. Eur J Plant Pathol. [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2025 Jan 31] May 3;160:813–823. Available from: http://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-021-02284-x doi.org/10.1007/s10658-021-02284-x

Holliday P. Fungus diseases of tropical crops. London: Cambridge Universal Press; 1980. 607p.

Galleti SR, Resende JA. Doenças da Figueira. In: Kimati H, Amorim L, Bergamim-Filho A, Camargo LEA, Resende JMA, organizators. Manual de Fitopatologia - Doenças das Plantas Cultivadas. 3 ed. São Paulo: Editora Ceres, 1997. p.400-405.

Marchi CE, Resende ML, Chalfun NN. Controle químico da ferrugem em mudas de figueira (Ficus carica). Sum Phytopath. 2001a; 27:240-245.

Marchi CE, Resende ML, Chalfun NN, Pozza EA. Fungicidas protetores, sistêmicos e o indutor de resistência BTH no controle da ferrugem da figueira. Sum Phytopath. 2001b; 27:235-240.

Nogueira EM, Ferrari JT. Efeito de fungicidas em pulverizações para o controle da ferrugem (Cerotelium fici) da figueira (Ficus carica). 1997; Fitopatol Bras; 22:290-291.

Nogueira EM. Avaliação de fungicidas no controle da ferrugem Cerotelium fici em figueira Ficus carica. 1991; Fitopatol Bras; 16:112-114.

Silveira SF, Rocabado JM, Dias VM, Caetano LC. Controle químico da ferrugem (Cerotelium fici) da figueira. Fitopatol Bras. 1998; 23 Suppl:282.

Rodrigues GD, Santos N, Santos EB. Análise das secas nas regiões norte e noroeste fluminense. Anuário do Instituto de Geociências [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2025 Jan 31]; 43(4):1-10. Available: from http://doi.org/10.11137/2020_4_01_10 doi: 10.11137/2020_4_01_10

Simão S. Tratado de Fruticultura. Piracicaba: FEALQ; 1998. 760p.

Suzuki MS, Silveira SF. Germinação in vitro de urediniósporos de Puccinia psidii armazenados sob diferentes combinações de umidade relativa e temperatura. Sum Phytopath. 2003; 29:188–192.

Vieira Junior JR, Silveira SF, Caetano LC. Escala diagramática de severidade para Ferrugem-da-Figueira (Cerotelium fici). 2000; Fitopatol Bras; 25 Suppl:433.

Campbell CL, Madden LV. Introduction to Plant Disease Epidemiology. 1. ed. New York: Jowhn Wiley and Sons; 1990. 532p.

SAEG: Sistema para Análises Estatísticas e Genéticas (9.1). Viçosa, MG: Fundação Arthur Bernardes. 2000.

Xavier AA, Silva AC, Guimarães MS, Matsuoka K, Hodges CS, Alfenas AC. Infection process of Puccinia psidii in Eucalyptus grandis leaves of different ages. Trop Plant Pathol [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2025 Jan 31]; 40(5):318–325. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40858-015-0043-7 doi: 10.1007/s40858-015-0043-7

Schmidt RA, Carey WA, Hollis C. Disease gradients of fusiform rust on oak seedlings exposed to a natural source of aeciospore inoculum. Phytopathol [Internet]. 1982 [cited 2025 Jan 31]; 72(11):1485-1489. Available from: http://www.apsnet.org/publications/phytopathology/backissues/Documents/1982Articles/Phyto72n11_1485.pdf

Caetano LC, Carvalho AJ, Campostrine E, Souza EF, Murakami KR, Cereja BS. Efeito do número de ramos produtivos sobre o desenvolvimento da área foliar e produtividade da figueira. Rev Bras Frutic. [Internet]. 2005 [cited 2025 Jan 31] Dez; 27(3):426-429. Available from: http://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-29452005000300021 doi.org/10.1590/S0100-29452005000300021

Downloads

Publicado

2025-05-06

Como Citar

Vieira-Júnior, J. R., da Silveira, S. F., Vieira-Faria, A. B., Aparecida Rodrigues, L., & Santos Caetano, L. C. (2025). Impact of leaf age on common fig susceptibility to rust caused by Cerotelium fici. Revista Ceres, 72, e72010. Recuperado de https://ojs.ceres.ufv.br/ceres/article/view/7710

Edição

Seção

CROP PRODUCTION

Artigos mais lidos pelo mesmo(s) autor(es)