Linear relationships between biometric variables in lettuce seedlings

Autores

  • Gabriella Rodrigues Gonçalves UENF
  • Cláudia Lopes Prins UENF
  • Maria Inês Diel UFSM
  • Alessandro Dal’Col Lúcio UFSM

Palavras-chave:

Lactuca sativa L., correlation, path analysis

Resumo

Seedling production is an important step in growing vegetables. The study of relationships between variables has applications in practically all areas of study and is useful in identifying relationships among quality variables in vegetable seedlings. Thus, this work aims to estimate linear relationships between biometric variables in lettuce seedlings. The seedlings were grown in expanded polystyrene trays (n = 4) with 128 and 200 cells each. Leaf area, stem diameter, shoot height, length, area, volume of the root, dry and fresh shoot mass variables were measured and evaluated with Pearson’s correlation analysis, multicollinearity diagnosis, condition number and the variance inflation factor, path analysis and canonical correlations. The results show linear relationships between the variables. For the 128 cell trays, there was a relationship between the total fresh mass and fresh shoot mass variables and between the total fresh mass and dry shoot mass variables. For the 200-cell trays, significant correlation was observed between the characters total fresh mass and fresh shoot mass variables and between root area and root volume variables, indicating that the greater the total fresh mass, the greater the fresh shoot mass and the greater the root area, the greater the root volume.

Referências

Ali Q, Ahsan M & Bin Mustafa HS (2013) Studies of genetic variability and correlation among morphological traits of maize (Zea mays L.) at seedling stage. Albanian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 12:405-410.

Ayubov MS, Norov TM, Saha S, Tseng TM, Reddy KR, Jenkins JN, Abdurakhmonov IY & Stelly DM (2021) Alteration of root and shoot morphologies by interspecific replacement of individual Upland cotton chromosome or chromosome segment pairs. Euphytica, 217:01-23.

Bezerra Neto FV, Leal NR, Costa FR, Gonçalves GM, Do Amaral Júnior AT, Vasconcellos HO & Mello M (2006) Análise biométrica de linhagens de abóbora. Horticultura Brasileira, 24:378-380.

Bouteillé M, Rolland G, Balsera C, Loudet O & Muller B (2012) Disentangling the intertwined genetic bases of root and shoot growth in Arabidopsis. PLoS One, 7:e32319.

Campanharo M, Rodrigues JJV, Lira Junior MA, Espindula MC & Costa JVT (2006) Características físicas de diferentes substratos para produção de mudas de tomateiro. Revista Caatinga, 19:140-145.

Cruz CD, Regazzi AJ & Carneiro PCS (2012) Modelos biométricos aplicados ao melhoramento genético. 4a ed. Viçosa, UFV. 514p.

Dardengo MCJD, Sousa EF, Reis EF & Gravina GA (2013) Crescimento e qualidade de mudas de café conilon produzidas em diferentes recipientes e níveis de sombreamento. Coffee Science, 8:500-509.

Embrapa - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (2010) Safira – Software para análise de fibras e raízes por imagem. Available at: https://www.embrapa.br/instrumentacao/busca-de-solucoes-tecnologicas/-/produto-servico/2016/safira---software-para-analise-de-fibras-e-raizes-por-imagem. Accessed on: April 17th, 2019.

Gomes JM & Paiva HN (2004) Viveiro florestais – propagação sexuada. 3a ed. Viçosa, UFV. 116p.

Guimarães VF, Echer MM & Minami K (2002) Métodos de produção de mudas, distribuição de matéria seca e produtividade de plantas beterraba. Horticultura Brasileira, 20:505-509.

Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE & Tatham RL (2009) Análise multivariada de dados. 6a ed. Brasil, Bookman Editora. 688p.

IBGE – Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (2019) Censo Agropecuário 2017. Available at: <https://censoagro2017.ibge.gov.br/templates/censo_agro/resultadosagro/indexhtml>. Accessed on: April 17th, 2019.

Johnson JD & Cline ML (1991) Seedling quality of southern pines. Forest regeneration manual, 36:143-159.

Medical Software Brolkstraat (2019) Digimizer image analysis software. Version 5.3.5. Belgium, MedCalc. Available at: https://www.digimizer. com/. Accessed on: April 17th, 2019.

Montgomery DC, Peck EA & Vining GG (2012) Introduction to linear regression analysis. 5o ed. United States of America, John Wiley & Sons. 672p.

Nascimento Filho FJ, Ando A, Cruz CD & Garcia TB (1993) Análise de caminhamento em mudas de guaraná. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 28:447-452.

Nascimento Filho FJ, Atroch AL & Cecon PR (2012) Associação entre características da parte aérea e do sistema radicular em mudas de guaranazeiro por correlações canônicas. Acta Amazonica, 42:241-244.

Oliveira AN, Da Silva AC, Da Silva SCR & Rodrigues ÉAC (2006) Variações genéticas para características do sistema radicular de mudas de baru (Dipteryx alata Vog.). Revista Árvore, 30:905-909.

Olivoto T, De Souza VQ, Carvalho IRC, Nardino M & Follmann DN (2015) Análise de trilha para caracteres relacionados ao crescimento de mudas de pepineiro. Enciclopédia Biosfera, 11:69-80.

R Development Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at: https://www.r-project.org/. Accessed on: September 17th, 2019.

Sala FC & Costa CP (2012) Retrospectiva e tendência da alfacicultura brasileira. Horticultura Brasileira, 30:187-194.

Shipley B & Meziane D (2002) The balanced‐growth hypothesis and the allometry of leaf and root biomass allocation. Functional Ecology, 16:326-331.

Silva AC, Silva VSG, Mantovanelli BC & Santos GM (2017a) Formação de mudas de alface em diferentes bandejas e substratos. Revista da Universidade Vale do Rio Verde, 15:465-471.

Silva AR, Malafaia G & Menezes IPP (2017b) Biotools: an R function to predict spatial gene diversity via an individual-based approach. Genetics and Molecular Research, 16:gmr16029655.

Silva JI, Vieira HD, Viana AP & Barroso DG (2010) Desenvolvimento de mudas de Coffea canephora Pierre ex A. froehner em diferentes combinações de substrato e recipiente. Coffee Science, 5:38-48.

Souza SR, Fontinele YR, Saldanha CS, Araújo Neto SE & Kusdra JF (2008) Produção de mudas de alface com o uso de substrato preparado com coprólitos de minhoca. Ciência e Agrotecnologia, 32:115-121.

Tsakaldimi M, Ganatsas P & Jacobs DF (2013) Prediction of planted seedling survival of five Mediterranean species based on initial seedling morphology. New forests, 44:327-339.

Venables WN & Ripley BD (2002) Modern applied statistics with S. 4o ed. New York, Springer. 501p.

Volpato & Barreto (2016) Estatística sem dor!!!. 2a ed. Botucatu, Best Writing. 160p.

Wright S (1921) Correlation and causation. Journal of Agricultural Research, 20:557-585.

Zhang H, Xue Y, Wang Z, Yang J & Zhang J (2009) Morphological and physiological traits of roots and their relationships with shoot growth in “super” rice. Field Crops Research, 113:31-40.

Downloads

Publicado

2025-06-03

Como Citar

Rodrigues Gonçalves, G., Lopes Prins, C., Diel, M. I., & Dal’Col Lúcio, A. (2025). Linear relationships between biometric variables in lettuce seedlings. Revista Ceres, 69(6), 659–667. Recuperado de https://ojs.ceres.ufv.br/ceres/article/view/8056

Edição

Seção

CROP PRODUCTION

Artigos mais lidos pelo mesmo(s) autor(es)