Use of geographic and edaphoclimatic information for the selection of soybeans for organic environments in current and future scenarios

Autores

  • Rafael Wirzbicki Casarotto Unijuí
  • Ivan Ricardo Carvalho Unijuí
  • Leonardo Cesar Pradebon UFSM
  • Murilo Vieira Loro UFSM
  • Willyan Júnior Adorian Bandeira Unijuí
  • João Pedro Dalla Roza Unijuí
  • Deivid Araújo Magano Unijuí
  • José Antonio Gonzalez da Silva Unijuí
  • Aljian Antonio Alban Gebana Brasil
  • Marcio Alberto Challiol Gebana Brasil

Palavras-chave:

Glycine max L., grain productivity, positioning of genotypes, selection

Resumo

The objective of this work was to select soybean genotypes for different organic growing environments, based on geographic and soil climatic information and use of predictions of meteorological variables for future scenarios. The experiment was conducted in a randomized block design, in an incomplete factorial scheme, with three agricultural harvests (2019/2020, 2020/2021 and 2021/2022) x 21 environments organics x 18 conventional soybean genotypes, arranged in three replications per environment. The study was di-vided into two agricultural scenarios based on soybean grain productivity, where scenario I was based on variable data on minimum temperature, mean temperature, maximum temperature, precipitation, relative humidity, incident radiation, in addition to geographic variables such as latitude, longitude and altitude. The scenario II was predicted based on data from 2023 to 2040 through climate projections, from the INPE were used.The genotypes LIN 16, BRS 539 and IPR 115 are superior in terms of grain productivity. The BRS 511 genotype had a high genetic average, high responsiveness to improvements in the growing environment and high stability. In the current scenario, latitude, soil pH and soil organic carbon stock are determining factors for the grain yield of genotypes destined for organic management. In the future scenario, the minimum, mean and maximum air temperatures will be the basis for positioning soybeans in organic conditions. The year 2026 will be the most critical for soybean production in southern Brazil due to low precipitation and high temperatures. In this context, it is envisaged to select cultivars that tolerate hot environments and are resilient to water restrictions. To guarantee their potential, it is necessary to provide environments with high fertility, vegetation cover and minimal interspecific competition with other plant species.

Referências

Guo B, Sun L, Jiang S, Ren H, Sun R, Wei Z, et al. Soybean genetic resources contributing to sustainable protein production. Theor Appl Genet. 2022;135:4095-121.

Sangiovo JP, Carvalho IR, Pradebon LC, Loro MV, Port ED, Scarton VD, et al. Selection of soybean lines based on a nutraceutical ideotype. Neotrop Agric Mag. 2023;10:e7356.

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Crops and livestock products [Internet]. Rome: FAO; [cited 2025 Jan 21]. Available from: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL/visualize

Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento (Conab). Grain harvest bulletin 4th survey - Harvest 2024/2025 [Internet]. Brasília: Conab; [cited 2025 Jan 21]. Available from: https://www.conab.gov.br/info-agro/safras/graos/boletim-da-safra-de-graos

Pradebon LC, Carvalho IR, Loro MV, Port ED, Bonfada B, Sfalcin IC, et al. Soybean adaptability and stability analyzes to the organic system through AMMI, GGE Biplot and mixed models methodologies. Cienc Rural. 2023;53(9):e20220262.

Hartman GL, Pawolowski ML, Herman TK, Eastburn D. Organically grown soybean production in the USA: Constraints and management of pathogens and insect pests. Agronomy. 2016;6:16.

Toleikiene M, Sliepetys J, Sarunaite L, Lazauskas S, Deveikyte I, Karadziuliene Z. Soybean development and productivity in response to organic management above the northern boundary of soybean distribution in Europe. Agronomy. 2021;11(2):214.

Murphy KM, Campbell KG, Lyon SR, Jones SS. Evidence of varietal adaptation to organic farming systems. Field Crops Res. 2007;102:172-7.

Carvalho IR, Nardino M, Souza VQ. Soybean improvement and cultivation. 1st ed. Porto Alegre: Cidadela; 2017. 336 p.

Scarton VD, Carvalho IR, Pradebon LC, Loro MV, Alban AA, Challiol MA, et al. Influence of meteorological variables and geographic factors in the selection of soybean lines. Neotrop Agric J. 2023;10(3):e7246.

Silva EH, Antolin LA, Zanon AJ, Andrade AS Júnior, Souza HA, Carvalho KS, et al. Impact assessment of soybean yield and water productivity in Brazil due to climate change. Eur J Agron. 2021;129:126329.

Santos CA, Neale CM, Mekonnen MM, Gonçalves IZ, Oliveira GO, Álvarez OR, et al. Trends of extreme air temperature and precipitation and their impact on corn and soybean yields in Nebraska, USA. Theor Appl Climatol. 2022;147(3):1379-99.

Google. Google Earth [Internet]. [cited 2022 Dec 13]. Available from: http://earth.google.com/

National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). NASA Prediction of Worldwide Energy Resources [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2023 Nov 15]. Available from: https://power.larc.nasa.gov/

Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE). Climate projections in Brazil [Internet]. [cited 2022 Dec 12]. Available from: http://pclima.inpe.br/

SoilGrids. Global gridded soil information [Internet]. [cited 2022 Dec 12]. Available from: https://soilgrids.org/

R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Internet]. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2024. Available from: https://www.R-project.org/

Wickham H. ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2016.

Microsoft WS. foreach: Provides foreach looping construct [Internet]. Version 1.5.2. 2022. Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=foreach

Olivoto T, Lúcio AD. metan: An R package for multi‐environment trial analysis. Methods Ecol Evol. 2020;11(6):783-9. doi:10.1111/2041-210X.13384

Hammad HM, Khaliq A, Abbas F, Farhad W, Aslam M, Shah GM, et al. Comparative effects of organic and inorganic fertilizers on soil organic carbon and wheat productivity under arid region. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 2020;51:1406-22.

Hijbeek R, Van Ittersum MK, Ten Berge HF, Gort G, Spiegel H, Whitmore AP. Do organic inputs matter? A meta-analysis of additional yield effects for arable crops in Europe. Plant Soil. 2017;411:293-303.

Gonçalves GM, Gomes RL, Lopes AC, Vieira PF. Adaptability and yield stability of soybean genotypes by REML/BLUP and GGE Biplot. Crop Breed Appl Biotechnol. 2020;20:e282920217.

Evangelista JS, Alves RS, Peixoto MA, Resende MD, Teodoro PE, Silva FL, et al. Soybean productivity, stability, and adaptability through mixed model methodology. Cienc Rural. 2020;51:e20200406.

Silva WI, Alcantara F Neto, Al-Qahtani W, Okla MK, Al-Hashimi A, Vieira PF, et al. Yield of soybean genotypes identified through GGE biplot and path analysis. PLoS One. 2022;17(10):e0274726.

Cruz CD, Carneiro PC, Regazzi AJ. Modelos biométricos aplicados ao melhoramento genético. 2. ed. Viçosa: Editora UFV; 2014. v.2. 668 p.

Baretta D, Nardino M, Carvalho IR, Pelegrin AJ, Ferrari VJ, Barros WS, et al. Estimates of genetic parameters and genotypic values prediction in maize landrace populations by REML/BLUP procedure. Genet Mol Res. 2017;16:1-14. doi:10.4238/gmr16029715.

Albuquerque JR, Lins HA, Santos MG, Freitas MA, Oliveira FS, Souza AR, et al. Influence of genotype-environment interaction on soybean (Glycine max L.) genetic divergence under semiarid conditions. Rev Fac Cienc Agrar UNCuyo. 2022;54:1-12.

Albuquerque JR, Lins HA, Santos MG, Freitas AM, Oliveira FS, Souza AR, et al. Adaptability and stability of soybean (Glycine max L.) genotypes in semiarid conditions. Euphytica. 2022;218:61.

Resende MD. Biometric and statistical genetics in perennial plant breeding. Colombo: Embrapa Florestas; 2002. 975 p.

Herrera GC, Poletine JP, Brondani ST, Antônio M, Barelli A, Silva VP. Adaptability and stability of soybean lines in southern Brazil through mixed modeling. J Agron Sci. 2020;9:185-202.

Loro MV, Carvalho IR, Silva JA, Sfalcin IC, Pradebon LC. Decomposition of white oat phenotypic variability by environmental covariates. Braz J Agric. 2022;97:279-302.

Alsajri FA, Wijewardana C, Irby T, Bellaloui N, Krutz JL, Dourado B, et al. Developing functional relationships between temperature and soybean yield and seed quality. Agron J. 2020;112:194-204.

Sobko O, Stahl A, Hahn V, Zikeli S, Claupein W, Gruber S. Environmental effects on soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr) production in central and South Germany. Agronomy. 2020;10(12):1847.

Carvalho IR [dataset]. https://github.com/IRC1000/Use-of-geographic-and-edaphoclimatic-information-for-the-selection-of-soybeans- 2025.

Downloads

Publicado

2025-11-07

Como Citar

Wirzbicki Casarotto, R., Carvalho, I. R., Pradebon, L. C., Vieira Loro, M., Adorian Bandeira, W. J., Dalla Roza, J. P., Araújo Magano, D., Gonzalez da Silva, J. A., Alban, A. A., & Challiol, M. A. (2025). Use of geographic and edaphoclimatic information for the selection of soybeans for organic environments in current and future scenarios. Revista Ceres, 72, e72033. Recuperado de https://ojs.ceres.ufv.br/ceres/article/view/8212

Edição

Seção

CROP PRODUCTION

Artigos mais lidos pelo mesmo(s) autor(es)