Modulation of the droplet spectrum by working pressure, adjuvants, and herbicides
Keywords:
droplet size, drift control, application efficiency, relative spanAbstract
The droplet spectrum is a crucial factor in optimizing herbicide efficacy and minimizing spray drift. This study evaluated the effects of working pressure (100 to 600 kPa) and six adjuvants on droplet size, both in the absence and presence of herbicides, using an air-induction nozzle (TTI 110015VP) and a particle analyzer. Higher working pressures reduced droplet size – measured as Dv0.1, Dv0.5 (volume median diameter), and Dv0.9, representing the diameters at which 10%, 50%, and 90% of the total spray volume consists of droplets of that size or smaller – and increased the volume percentage of fine droplets (V100), regardless of the adjuvant or herbicide. Adjuvants influenced the droplet spectrum, with Xtend Protect1 significantly reducing Dv0.9. However, the lowest relative span, indicating greater droplet size uniformity, was achieved by different adjuvants depending on the working pressure. A significant interaction between herbicides and adjuvants was observed, underscoring the need for a comprehensive analysis of these variables to optimize application quality. The addition of adjuvants and herbicides to the spray solution altered the correlations between droplet spectrum variables, emphasizing the importance of considering multiple factors in application decisions. Selecting the appropriate working pressure and adjuvant, along with a thorough analysis of the droplet spectrum, is essential for effective weed control, reducing spray drift, and ensuring environmental, applicator, and consumer safety.
References
1. Butts TR, Virk SS, Kouame KB. Droplet size, velocity, and spray coverage from a magnetic-assisted sprayer. Biosyst Eng. 2024;245:1-11. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2024.06.010
2. Godinho JD Júnior, Vieira LC, Ruas RA, Carvalho A Filho, Faria VR, Deus PI. Spray nozzles, working pressures, and use of adjuvant in reduction of 2,4-D herbicide spray drift. Planta Daninha. 2020;38:1-7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/ S0100-83582020380100070
3. Silva CL, Cunha JP, Alvarenga CB, Zampiróli R. Interface Properties and droplet spectra as a function of adjuvants and spray nozzles. AgriEngineering. 2025;7:116. DOI: 10.3390/ agriengineering7040116. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/ agriengineering7040116
4. Prado EP, Guerreiro JC, Ferreira-Filho PJ, Nascimento V, Ferrari S, Galindo FS, Funichello M, et al. Performance of spray nozzles and droplet size on glufosinate deposition and weed biological efficacy. Crop Prot. 2024;177:106560. Available from: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.cropro.2023.106560
5. Griesang F, Spadoni AB, Ferreira PH, Ferreira MC. Effect of working pressure and spacing of nozzles on the quality of spraying distribution. Crop Prot. 2022;151:105818. Available from: https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2021.105818
6. Li X, Chen L, Tang Q, Li L, Cheng W, Hu P, Zhang R. Characteristics on the spatial distribution of droplet size and velocity with difference adjuvant in nozzle spraying. Agronomy. 2022;12:1960. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12081960
7. Milanowski M, Subr A, Combrzynski M, Rózanska-Boczula M, Parafiniuk S. Effect of adjuvant, concentration, and water type on the droplet size characteristics in agricultural nozzles. Appl Sci. 2022;12:5821. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/ app12125821
8. Hewitt AJ. Adjuvant use for the management of pesticide drift, leaching, and runoff. Pest Manag Sci. 2024;80:2649-59. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.8255
9. Creech CF, Kruger GR, Oliveira M, Easterly A. Reduced adsorption of dicamba spray droplets on leaves as droplet size increases. Weed Technol. 2024;1-32. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/ wet.2024.34
10. Appah S, Asante EA, Ayambire CA. Analogous charging effect of surfactant-pesticide spray jet on droplet characteristics and deposition on hydrophobic leaf surfaces. Eur J Agric Food Sci. 2024;6(1):45-50. Available from: 10.24018/ejfood.2024.6.1.757
11. Basílio S, Furtado MR Júnior, Alvarenga CB, Vitória EL, Vargas BC, Privitera S, et al. Effect of adjuvants on physical-chemical properties, droplet size, and drift reduction potential. Agriculture. 2024;14:2271. DOI: 10.3390/agriculture14122271. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14122271
12. Ávila R Neto, Melo AA, Ulguim AR, Pedroso RM, Barbieri GF, Luchese EF, et al. Mixtures of 2,4-D and Dicamba with other pesticides and their influence on application parameters. Int J Pest Manag. 2024;70(1):121-30. Available from: https://doi.org/10.108 0/09670874.2021.1959082
13. Noguera MM, Avila LA, Zimmer M, Becker R, Egewarth K, Camargo ER. Buffer zones for 2,4-D application nearby tobacco fields. Cienc Rural. 2022;52:e20210350. Available from: https:// doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20210350
14. Hu P, Zhang R, Chen L, Li LL, Tang Q, Yan W, et al. Effect of polymer adjuvant type and concentration on atomization characteristics of nozzle. Agriculture. 2024;14:404. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14030404
15. Liao J, Luo X, Wang P, Zhou Z, O’Donnell CC, Zang Y, et al. Analysis of the influence of different parameters on droplet characteristics and droplet size classification categories for air induction nozzle. Agronomy. 2020;10:256. Available from: https:// doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10020256
16. Xue S, Han J, Xi Z, Lan Z, Wen RF, Ma X. Coordination of distinctive pesticide adjuvants and atomization nozzles on droplets spectrum evolution for spatial drift reduction. Chin J Chem Eng. 2024;66:250-62. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. cjche.2023.10.001
17. Ferguson JC, Hewitt AJ, Eastin JA, Connell RJ, Roten RL, Kruger GR. Developing a comprehensive drift reduction technology risk assessment scheme. J Plant Prot Res. 2014;54:85-9. Available from: https://journals.pan.pl/Content/89309/PDF/JPPR_54(1)_13_Ferguson.pdf
18. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers. ASABE S572.3: Spray nozzle classification by droplet spectra. ASABE; 2020.
19. Cauwer B, Meuter I, Ryck S, Dekeyser D, Zwertvaegher I, Nuyttens D. Performance of drift-reducing nozzles in controlling small weed seedlings with contact herbicides. Agronomy. 2023;13(5):1342. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13051342
20. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2024. Available from: www.r-project.org.
21. Faggion F, Antuniassi UR. Desempenho de pontas de pulverização quanto a indução de ar nas gotas. Energia Agric. 2010;25:72-82. Available from: https://doi.org/10.17224/EnergAgric.2010v25n4p72-82
22. Yang W, Zhong W, Jia W, Ou M, Dong X, Zhang T, et al. The effect of oil-in-water emulsion pesticide on the evolution of liquid sheet rim disintegration and the spraying distribution. Crop Prot. 2024;177:106547. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. cropro.2023.106547
23. Ma J, Liu K, Dong X, Huang X, Ahmad F, Qiu B. Force and motion behaviour of crop leaves during spraying. Biosyst Eng. 2023;235:83-99. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2023.09.012
24. Rubert J, Tarouco CP, Wesz AM, Bortolin ES, Reis CB, Ulguim AR. Simulated drift of 2,4-D and Dicamba in pecan (Carya illinoinensis K. Koch) and olive trees (Olea europaea L.). Cienc Florestal. 2024;34:1-20. Available from: https://doi. org/10.5902/1980509869073
25. Ceretta JM, Albrecht AJ, Albrecht LP, Silva AF, Yokoyama AS. Can pre and/or post-emergent herbicide application affect soybean seed quality? Caatinga. 2023;36:740-7. Available from: https://doi. org/10.1590/1983-21252023v36n401rc
26. TeeJet Technologies. Catálogo 52-PT [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Jul 1]. Available from: www.teejet.com.
27. Yang W, Zhong W, Jia W, Ou M, Dong X, Zhang T, et al. Study on atomization mechanisms and spray fragmentation characteristics of water and emulsion butachlor. Front Plant Sci. 2023;14:1265013. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1265013
28. He M, Qi P, Han L, He X. Study on spray evaluation: The key role of droplet collectors. Agronomy. 2024;14:305. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14020305
29. Xie Q, Song M, Wen T, Cao W, Zhu Y, Ni J. An intelligent spraying system for weeds in wheat fields based on a dynamic model of droplets impacting wheat leaves. Front Plant Sci. 2024;15:1420649. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2024.1420649
30. Vieira BC, Butts TR, Rodrigues AO, Schleier III JJ, Fritz BK, Kruger GR. Particle drift potential of glyphosate plus 2,4-D choline pre-mixture formulation in a low-speed wind tunnel. Weed Technol. 2020;34:520-7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/ wet.2020.15
31. Liu Q, Shan C, Zhang H, Cancan C, Lan Y. Evaluation of liquid atomization and spray drift reduction of hydraulic nozzles with four spray adjuvant solutions. Agriculture. 2023;13:236. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13020236
32. Alves GS, Kruger GR, Cunha JP. Spray drift and droplet spectrum from Dicamba sprayed alone or mixed with adjuvants using air-induction nozzles. Pesqui Agropecu Bras. 2018;53:693-702. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2018000600005
33. Sijs R, Bonn D. The effect of adjuvants on spray droplet size from hydraulic nozzles. Pest Manag Sci. 2020;76:3487-94. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.5742
34. Rodrigues AD Neto, Ribeiro NA, Oliveira FA, Faria GA, Prado EP. Droplet spectrum characteristics and drift potential of different droplet classes and spray volumes application of atrazine with nicosulfuron. Cienc Rural. 2023;53:e20220509. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20220509
35. Privitera S, Manetto G, Pascuzzi S, Pessina D, Cerruto E. Drop size measurement techniques for agricultural sprays: A state-ofthe-art review. Agronomy. 2023;13:678. Available from: https:// doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13030678
