Agronomic performance of wheat cultivars under different plant density and planting times
Keywords:
Triticum aestivum L., growth traits,, agrometeorology, agricultural management practicesAbstract
Wheat plays a critical role in global food security and the agricultural economy. In Minas Gerais, Brazil, one of the major challenges for wheat production is the high variability of meteorological conditions. Therefore, studies that support wheat producers in defining more accurate sowing dates and plant densities according to cultivar requirements are essential, as they can contribute to increasing yield and enhancing agricultural resilience. The aim of this study was to evaluate the response of wheat cultivars, based on growth, micrometeorological, and yield-related traits, under different sowing times and plant densities. The experiment was conducted during the autumn–winter growing season of 2022 in an experimental area located in Ijaci, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Four wheat cultivars were evaluated under different sowing times and plant densities. Agronomic and agrometeorological variables were monitored throughout the field experiment. The results showed that wheat sown within the recommended sowing window exhibited superior performance, benefiting from greater soil water availability, higher growth rates, and increased radiation interception. Grain yield was, on average, 37.9% higher under normal sowing conditions compared with late sowing, confirming the strong influence of sowing time on crop performance. No significant differences were observed among cultivars or plant densities. These findings provide relevant guidance for producers and reinforce sowing time as a key factor for efficient wheat management
References
1. Pasinato A, Cunha GRD, Fontana DC, Monteiro JEBDA, Nakai AM, Oliveira AFD. Potential area and limitations for the expansion of rainfed wheat in the Cerrado biome of Central Brazil. Pesqui Agropecu Bras. 2018;53:779-90.
2. Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento. Boletim safra grãos [Internet]. Brasília: CONAB; 2023 [citado 2023 Jan 5]. Disponível em: https://www.conab.gov.br/info-agro/safras/graos/boletim-dasafra-de-graos
3. Pereira JF, Cunha GR, Moresco ER. Improved drought tolerance in wheat is required to unlock the production potential of the Brazilian Cerrado. Crop Breed Appl Biot. 2019;19:217-25.
4. Nardino M, Perin EC, Aranha BC, Carpes ST, Fontoura BH, Sousa DJP, et al. Understanding drought response mechanisms in wheat and multi-trait selection. PLoS One. 2022;17:e0266368.
Bhandari R, Poudel MR. Genotype × environment interaction and selection parameters for high yielding wheat genotypes under irrigated and heat stress environment. Sustain Agr Envir. 2024;3:e12098.
6. Maciel JLN, Kovaleski M, Silva DD, Cavalheiro JN, Clebsch CC, Deuner CC. Correlation between blast resistance in wheat cultivars and conidia sporulation rate of Pyricularia oryzae Triticum. Ciênc Rural. 2024;54:e20230086.
7. Taiz L, Zeiger E, Møller IM, Murphy A. Fisiologia e desenvolvimento vegetal. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2023.
8. Brasil. Ministério da Agricultura e Pecuária. Portaria SPA/MAPA nº 380, de 16 de agosto de 2024. Aprova o Zoneamento Agrícola de Risco Climático da cultura do trigo para o estado de Minas Gerais. Diário Oficial da União. 2024.
9. Cunha GRD, Caierão E. Trigo e triticale: informações técnicas para 15ª Reunião da Comissão Brasileira de Pesquisa de Trigo e Triticale. Brasília: Embrapa; 2023.
10. Fischer RA, Ramos OM, Monasterio IO, Sayre KD. Yield response to plant density, row spacing and raised beds in low latitude spring wheat with ample soil resources: an update. Field Crops Res. 2019;232:95-105.
11. Yu L, Zhao X, Gao X, Siddique KH. Improving/maintaining water-use efficiency and yield of wheat by deficit irrigation: A global meta-analysis. Agric Water Manag. 2020;228:105906.
12. Jarecki W. Response of winter wheat to diversified sowing date and sowing density. J Cent Eur Agric. 2024;25:945-54.
13. Rossetti C, Tremea MG, Schalanski GR, Sperling DR, Tunes LVM. Utilização de diferentes espaçamentos entre sementes de trigo antigo e trigo moderno. In: Tunes LVM, Rosseti C, organizadores. Desafios e avanços para produção de sementes em sistema de cultivo orgânico. Nova Xavantina: Pantanal; 2024. p. 70-6.
14. Santos HD, Jacomine PT, Anjos LHC, Oliveira VÁ, Lumbreras JF, Coelho MR, et al. Sistema brasileiro de classificação de solos. 5. ed. Brasília: Embrapa; 2018.
15. Soil Survey Staff. Keys to Soil Taxonomy. 13. ed. Washington: USDA; 2022.
16. Dantas AAA, Carvalho LGD, Ferreira E. Climatic classification and tendencies in Lavras region, MG. Ciênc Agrotec. 2007;31:1862-6.
17. Thornthwaite CW, Mather JR. The Water Balance. Centerton: Drexel Institute of Climatology; 1955.
18. Monteith JL. Climate and the efficiency crop production in Britain. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1977;281:277-94.
19. Varlet-Grancher C, Gosse G, Chartier M, Sinoquet H, Bonhomme R, Allirand JM. Mise au point: rayonnement solaire absorbé ou intercepté par un couvert végétal. Agronomie. 1989;9:419-39.
20. Caron BO, Lamego FP, Souza VQD, Costa EC, Eloy E, Behling A, et al. Interceptação da radiação luminosa pelo dossel de espécies florestais e sua relação com o manejo das plantas daninhas. Ciênc Rural. 2012;42:75-82.
21. Ferreira DF. Sisvar: a computer statistical analysis system. Ciênc Agrotec. 2011;35:1039-42.
22. Zhang J, Cao R, Zhang Z, Wang X, Ma X, Xiong S. Effects of row spacing on soil nitrogen availability, wheat morpho-physiological traits and radiation use efficiency. Front Soil Sci. 2022;2:981263.
23. Xu H, Liu M, Li C, Tang Y, Xue Q, Xiao W, et al. Optimizing agronomic management practices for enhanced radiation capture and improved radiation use efficiency in winter wheat. Plants. 2024;13:2036.
24. Aparecido LEDO, Padua JMV, Torsoni GB, Barboza TOC, Viol LES, Silva CMJR, et al. Climate risk zoning for wheat crops in the southeastern region of Brazil. J Sci Food Agric. 2024;4:456-67.
25. Sadras VO, Villalobos FJ, López-Bernal A, Fereres E. Radiation Interception, Radiation Use Efficiency, and Crop Productivity. In: Principles of agronomy for sustainable agriculture. Cham: Springer; 2024. p. 177-97.
26. Souza MA, Ramalho MAP. Controle genético e tolerância ao estresse de calor em populações híbridas e em cultivares de trigo. Pesqui Agropecu Bras. 2001;36:1245-53.
27. Lamba K, Kumar M, Singh V, Chaudhary L, Sharma R, Yashveer S, et al. Heat stress tolerance indices for identification of the heat tolerant wheat genotypes. Sci Rep. 2023;13:10842.
28. Ribeiro G, Pimente AJB, Souza MA, Fonseca WB. Estresse por altas temperaturas em trigo: impacto no desenvolvimento e mecanismos de tolerância. Curr Agric Sci Technol. 2012;18:133-42.
29. Mishra D, Shekhar S, Chakraborty S, Chakraborty N. High temperature stress responses and wheat: impacts and alleviation strategies. Environ Exp Bot. 2021;190:104589.
30. Molero G, Joynson R, Pinera‐Chavez FJ, Gardiner LJ, Rivera‐ Amado C, Hall A, et al. Elucidating the genetic basis of biomass accumulation and radiation use efficiency in spring wheat and its role in yield potential. Plant Biotechnol J. 2019;17:1276-88.
31. Hubbart S, Smillie IRA, Heatley M, Swarup R, Foo CC, Zhao L, et al. Enhanced thylakoid photoprotection can increase yield and canopy radiation use efficiency in rice. Commun Biol. 2018;1:22.
32. Peng D, Xu K, Liu Y, Chen Y. Effects of sowing date and planting density on stalk characteristics and lodging resistant mechanical properties of maize. J Northwest A & F Univ Nat Sci Ed. 2024;52:10.
33. Fordonski G, Okorski A, Olszewski J, Dąbrowska J, Pszczółkowska A. The effect of sowing date on the growth and yield of soybeans cultivated in North-Eastern Poland. Agriculture. 2023;13:2199.
34. Pires J, Scheeren P, Caierao E, Castro RL, Lau D, Santana F, et al. Indicações para o manejo da cultivar de trigo BRS Belajoia (RS, SC e sul do PR). Passo Fundo: Embrapa Trigo; 2021. (Comunicado Técnico, 383).
