Water balance and technical-financial performance of irrigation in the cassava cultivation
Palavras-chave:
Manihot esculenta Crantz, total useful water, root mass, physical productivity and maximum economic efficiencyResumo
The objective, in this research, was to evaluate the agricultural productivity and the financial performance of levels of irrigation in the cassava. For this, experiment was carried out, under a randomized block design, with six irrigation levels, as a function of crop evapotranspiration (L0 = 0% (rainfed), L1 = 40%, L2 = 80%, L3 = 120%, L4 = 160% and L5 = 200% of ETC) and four repetitions. Was evaluated: length and mass of roots, productivity of maximum physical and economic efficiency of roots and productivity of the aerial part. The irrigation level L5 or total useful water of 1,023 mm, got greatest productivity of the aerial part, 57 Mg ha-1. With a total useful water of 926 mm, this irrigation level, generated the greatest length and mass of roots per plant and the maximum physical productivity, 94 Mg ha-1. As well as the root yield of maximum economic efficiency, which is achieved with a total usable water, 914 mm. Among the irrigation levels studied, L3 (963 mm) is the one that provides the greatest productivity of roots, 90 Mg ha-1, and gross revenue 167% higher than in areas cultivated under rainfed conditions. Therefore, irrigation of cassava is economically viable.
Referências
Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D & Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration: Guidelines for computing crop water requirements - FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56. Rome, FAO. 326p.
Aparecido LEO, Moraes JSC, Meneses KC, Lorençone PA, Lorençone JA, Souza GHO & Torsoni GB (2020) Agricultural zoning as tool for expansion of cassava in climate change scenarios. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 142:1085-1095.
Barros AHC, Araujo Filho JC, Silva AB & Santiago GACF (2012) Climatologia do estado de Alagoas. Recife, Embrapa Solos. 32p. (Boletim de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento, 211).
Cock JH & Connor DJ (2021) Cassava. In: Sadras & Calderini (Eds.) Crop Physiology Case Histories for Major Crops. London, Academic Press. p.588-633.
Daryanto S, Wang L & Jacinthe PA (2016) Drought effects on root and tuber production: A meta-analysis. Agricultural Water Management, 176:122-131.
El-Sharkawy MA (2004) Cassava biology and physiology. Plant Molecular Biology, 56:481-501.
FAO - Organização das Nações Unidas para Alimentação e Agricultura (2023) Crops. Available at: <https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL>http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC. Accessed on: April 04th, 2019.
Ferreira Júnior RA, Souza JLD, Lyra GB, Teodoro I, Santos MAD & Porfirio A (2012) Crescimento e fotossíntese de cana-de-açúcar em função de variáveis biométricas e meteorológicas. Revista Brasileira de engenharia agrícola e ambiental, 16:1229-1236.
Ferreira PV (2018) Estatística experimental aplicada às Ciências Agrárias. Viçosa, UFV. 588p.
Howeler R, Lutaladio N & Thomas G (2013) Save and grow: cassava. A guide to sustainable production intensification. Rome, FAO. 142p.
IBGE - Instituto Brasileiro de Geográfico e Estatística (2023) Produção agrícola. Available at: <https://sidra.ibge.gov.br/tabela/188#resultado>. Accessed on: April 04th, 2019.
Mélo Neto DG, Coelho DG, Andrade MT & Alves JO (2018) Initial growth of cassava plants cv. Mossoró under different water regimes. Revista Agro@mbiente On-line, 12:191-199.
Morais L, Santiago AD & Cavalcante MHB (2017) Phenotypic stability in cassava estimated by the AMMI analysis with supplementary genotypes. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology, 17:366-372.
Munyahali W, Pypers P, Swennen R, Walangululu J & Vanlauwe B (2017) Responses of cassava growth and yield to leaf harvesting frequency and NPK fertilizer in South Kivu, Democratic Republic of Congo. Fiel Crops Research, 214:194-201.
Neves JCB, Santana MJ, Fernandes ALT, Assis MP & Van Kempen JC (2021) Viabilidade econômica do feijoeiro, em função de lâminas de irrigação e doses de nitrogênio. Nativa, 9:202-208.
Odubanjo OO, Olufayo AA & Oguntunde PG (2011) Water Use, Growth, and Yield of Drip Irrigated Cassava in a Humid Tropical Environment. Soil & Water Research, 6:10-20.
Pereira AR, Angelocci LR & Sentelhas PC (2002) Agrometeorologia (Fundamentos e aplicações práticas). Guaíba, Livraria e Editora Agropecuária. 478p.
Pipatsitee A, Eiumnoh A, Praseartkul P, Taota K, Kongpugdee S, Sakulleerungroj K & Cha-um S (2018) Application of infrared thermography to assess cassava physiology under water deficit condition. Plant Production Science, 21:398-406.
RID - Royal Irrigation Department (2010) Crop coeficiente. Available at: <http://water.rid.go.th/hwm/cropwater/CWRdata/Kc/kc_th.pdf>. Accessed on: April 04th, 2019.
Santos HG, Jacomine PKT, Anjos LHC, Oliveira VA, Lumbreras JF, Coelho MR, Almeida JA, Araújo Filho JC, Oliveira JB & Cunha TJF (2018) Sistema Brasileiro de Classificação de Solos. Brasília, Embrapa. 356p.
Silva VPR, Pereira EMM, Azevedo PVD, Sousa FAS & Sousa IF (2011) Análise da pluviometria e dias chuvosos na região Nordeste do Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental, 15:131-138.
Souza LS, Silva J & Souza LD (2009) Recomendação de calagem e adubação para o cultivo da mandioca. Cruz das Almas, Embrapa. 6p. (Comunicado Técnico, 133).
Tinini RCDR, Zambom MA, Dessbesell JG, Adamante D & Venturini T (2021) Silagem da parte aérea da mandioca como um alimento alternativo na dieta de vacas em lactação revisão de literatura. Arquivos de ciências veterinárias e zoologia, 24:e2405.
Tironi LF, Uhlmann LO, Streck NA, Samboranha KF, Freitas CPO & Silva MR (2015) Desempenho de cultivares de mandioca em ambiente subtropical. Bragantia, 74:58-66.
Troccoli A, Dubus L & Haupt SE (2014) Weather Matters for Energy. New York, Springer. 528p.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
