Adaptability and Stability of Soybean Cultivars in Lowland Production System
Keywords:
Glycine max L., crop rotation, yield potential, sustainabilityAbstract
The objective was to study the adaptability and stability of soybean cultivars in the lowland production system under different conditions in a subtropical environment. Fourteen soybean cultivars were evaluated in five locations and three growing seasons in Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil. Three sowing dates were evaluated in each location and growing season and named as: early, recommended for high yield and recommended to minimize the risk of water deficiency. The experiment was carried out in a randomized complete block design, with three replicates. Yield data was submitted to analysis of variance, and the Eberhart and Russel method was used to study its adaptability and stability. In general, the cultivars that showed adaptability and stability to the three sowing dates showed MG between 5.6 to 6.4 and the type of indeterminate growth. The cultivars A 6411 RG, TEC 5936 IPRO and TECIRGA 6070 RR combined wide adaptability and stability, the cultivars Fundacep 65 RR and 6869 RSF RR presented high yield and stability of production and are recommended for lowland environments.
References
Bortoluzzi MP, Heldwein AB, Trentin R, Nied AH, Silva JR & Da Rocha L (2020) Adjustament of probability funcions to water excesso and déficit in soybean cultivated in lowland soils. Irriga, 25:402-419.
Carvalho E, Peluzio JM, Santos WF, Afferri FS & Dotto MA (2013) Adaptabilidade e estabilidade de genótipos de soja em Tocantins. Agro@mbiente, 7:162-169.
Concenço G, Andres A, Teló GM, Martins MB & Moisinho UIS (2017) Phytosociological characterization of weeds as a function of residual herbicides applied to rice grown under sprinkler irrigation. Experimental Agriculture, 54:01-12.
CONAB - Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento (2017) Acompanhamento da safra brasileira de grãos. V. 5 - Safra 2017/18. N. 3 - Terceiro levantamento. Available at: . Accessed on: December 08th, 2020.
Eberhart SA & Russell WA (1966) Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Science, 6:36 40.
Henry CG, Sartori GMS, Jason G, Marchesan E, Hirsh SM, Horton A, Espinoza L & James H (2018) Deep tillage and gypsum amendments on fully, deficit irrigated, and dryland soybean. Agronomy Journal, 110:01-12.
Marques MC, Hamawari OT, Sediyama T, Bueno MR, Reis MS, Cruz CD & Nogueira AO (2011) Adaptabilidade e estabilidade de genótipos de soja em diferentes épocas de semeadura. Bioscience Journal, 27:59-69.
Oliveira LG, Hamawaki OT, Simon GA, De Sousa LB, Nogueira AO, Rezende DF & Hamawaki CDL (2012) Adaptability and stability of soybean yield in two soybean producing regions. Bioscience Journal, 28:852-861.
Da Rocha TS, Streck NA, Zanon AJ, Marcolin E, Petry MT, Tagliapietra EL, Barlest D & Bexaira KP (2017) Performance of soybean in hydromorphic and non hydromorphic soil under irrigated or rainfed conditions. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 52:293-302.
Romanato FN, Hamawaki OT, Sousa LB, Nogueira AO, Neto DC, Borges CCR, Hamawaki CDL & HamawakI RL (2016) Parametric and nonparametric analysis for determining the adaptability and stability of soybean genotypes in three sowing periods. Biosciensce Journal, 32:574-580.
Sartori GMS, Marchesan E, De David R, Donato G, Coelho LL, Aires NA & Aramburu BB (2016a) Sistemas de preparo do solo e de semeadura no rendimento de grãos de soja em área de várzea. Ciência Rural, 46:492-498.
Sartori GMS, Marchesan E, De David R, Carlesso R, Petry MT, Aires N, Giacomeli R, Aramburu BB & Silva AL (2016b) Soybean Tillage Systems and Physical Changes in Surface Layers of Two Albaqualf Soils. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, 40:01-15.
SAS Institute Inc. (2004) Statistical Analysis System user’s guide. Version 9.1. Cary, Statistical Analysis System Institute. 1531p.
Silva KB, Bruzil AT, Zuffol AM, Zambiazzil E, Soares IO, Rezende MF, Vilelal GDL, Botelho FBS, Teixeira CM & Coelho MAO (2016) Adaptability and phenotypic stability of soybean cultivars for grain yield and oil content. Genetics and Molecular Research, 15:01-11.
Silveira DA, Pricinotto LF, Nardino M, Bahry CA, Prete CEC & Cruz L (2016) Determination of the adaptability and stability of soybean cultivars in different locations and at different sowing times in Paraná state using the AMMI and Eberhart and Russel methods. Semina: CiênciasAgrárias, 37:3973-3982.
Song W, Sun S, Ibrahim SE, Xu Z, Wu H, Hu X, Jia H, Cheng Y, Yang Z, Jiang S, Wu T, Sinegovskii M, Sapery E, Nepumuceno A, Jiang B, Hou W, Sinegovskaya V, Wu C, Gai J & Han T (2019) Standard Cultivar Selection and Digital Quantification for Precise Classification of Maturity Groups in Soybean. Crop Science, 59:1997-2006.
Zanon AJ, Winck JEM, Streck NA, Marques da Rocha TS, Cera JC, Richter GL, Lago I, Santos M, Maciel L da R, Guedes JC & Marchesan E (2015) Desenvolvimento de cultivares de soja em função do grupo de maturação e tipo de crescimento em terras altas e terras baixas. Bragantia, 74:400-411.
Zanon AJ, Streck NA & Grassini P (2016) Climate and management factors influence soybean yield potential in a subtropical environment. Agronomy Journal, 8:01-08.
Zanon AJ, Da Silva MR, Tagliapietra EL, Cera JC, Bexaira KP, Richter GL, Duarte Junior AJ, Marques da Rocha TS, Weber OS & Streck NA (2018) Ecofisiologia da soja: visando altas produtividades. Santa Maria, Palloti. 136p.
Zdziarski AD, Todeschini MH, Milioli AS, Woyann LG, Madureira A, Stoco MG & Benin G (2018) Key soybean maturity groups to increase grain yield in Brazil. Crop Science, 57:1155-1165.
