Interaction among Meloidogyne incognita and M. enterolobii with Pratylenchus zeae in Sugarcane

Authors

  • Raycenne Rosa Leite Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco
  • Diego Arruda Huggins de Sá Leitão University of Florida
  • Elvira Maria Regis Pedrosa Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco
  • Daniele de Brum Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
  • Lilian Margarete Paes Guimarães Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco

Keywords:

mixed interaction, root-knot nematode, root-lesion nematode, Saccharum spp

Abstract

Plant-parasitic nematodes Meloidogyne incognita and Pratylenchus zeae are commonly associated to sugarcane in Brazil causing serious problems. Thus, the objectives of this study were to determine the reproductive rate of M. incognita and M. enterolobii in sugarcane when inoculated in isolation and together with P. zeae and the effects of this interaction on the early development of two varieties of sugarcane. Two experiments were performed. In the first experiment, three different population densities of M. incognita and M. enterolobii were inoculated in both sugarcane varieties. In the second experiment, inoculation of P. zeae followed by inoculation with M. incognita or M. enterolobii was carried out. Meloidogyne enterolobii did not show good development in both sugarcane varieties after 120 days of infestation; contrary to M. incognita, which reached high population levels. Fresh and dry shoot biomasses were lower under joint infestation of P. zeae and Meloidogyne. In mixed infections, P. zeae suppressed the development of M. incognita and increased the multiplication of M. enterolobii in the variety RB867515 whereas the contrary was observed in the variety RB92579, demonstrating once more the resistance reaction of this variety to M. enterolobii.

References

1. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAOSTAT: crops and livestock products [Internet]. Rome: FAO; 2023 [cited 2026 Aug 26]. Available from: https://www.fao.org/faostat/

2. García-Bustamante CA, Aguilar-Rivera N, Zepeda-Pirrón M, Armendariz-Arnez C. Development of indicators for the sustainability of the sugar industry. Environ Socioecon Stud. 2018;6(4):22-38. doi:10.2478/environ-2018-0025

3. Dinardo-Miranda LL, Piveta JP, Fracasso JV. Influência da época de aplicação de nematicidas em soqueiras sobre as populações de nematoides e a produtividade da cana-de-açúcar. Bragantia. 2008;67(1):179-90. doi:10.1590/S0006-87052008000100022

4. Cadet P, Spaull VW. Nematode parasites of sugarcane. In: Luc M, Sikora RA, Bridge J, editors. Plant parasitic nematodes in subtropical and tropical agriculture. Wallingford: CAB International; 2005. p. 645-74.

5. Guimarães LMP, Pedrosa EMR, Coelho RSB, Chaves A, Maranhão SRVL, Miranda TL. Efeito do metil jasmonato e silicato de potássio no parasitismo de Meloidogyne incognita e Pratylenchus zeae em cana-de-açúcar. Nematol Bras. 2008;32(1):50-5.

6. Steven A, Sunday S, Fisayo D. Biodiversity of plant-parasitic nematodes of sugarcane in Bacita, Nigeria. J Entomol Nematol. 2014;6(6):71-9. doi:10.5897/JEN2014.0096

7. Fontana LF, Dias-Arieira CR, Mattei D, Severino JJ, Biela F, Arieira JO. Competition between Pratylenchus zeae and Meloidogyne incognita on sugarcane. Nematropica. 2015;45(1):1-8.

8. Mekete T, Mandefro W, Greco N. Relationship between initial population densities of Meloidogyne javanica and damage to pepper and tomato in Ethiopia. Nematol Mediterr. 2003;31(2):169-71.

9. Kayani MZ, Mukhtar T, Hussain MA. Effects of southern root-knot nematode population densities and plant age on growth and yield parameters of cucumber. Crop Prot. 2017;92:207-12. doi:10.1016/j.cropro.2016.09.007

10. Charchar JM, Marouelli WA, Giordano LB, Aragão FAS. Reprodução de Meloidogyne incognita raça 1 e produtividade de cultivares de ervilha sob diferentes lâminas de água. Pesqui Agropec Bras. 2005;40(10):989-95. doi:10.1590/S0100-204X2005001000007

11. Kanayama FS, Sera GH, Sera T, Mata JS, Ruas PM, Ito DS. Progênies de Coffea arabica cv IPR 100 com resistência ao nematoide Meloidogyne incognita raça 1. Cienc Agrotec. 2009;33(5):1321-6. doi:10.1590/S1413-70542009000500018

12. Dinardo-Miranda LL, Gil MA, Coelho AL, Garcia V, Menegatti CC. Efeito da torta de filtro sobre as infestações de nematoides e a produtividade da cana-de-açúcar. Nematol Bras. 2003;27:61-7.

13. Severino JJ, Dias-Arieira CR, Tessmann DJ. Nematodes associated with sugarcane in sandy soils in Paraná, Brazil. Nematropica. 2010;40:111-9.

14. Ferraz LCCB. Interações entre Pratylenchus brachyurus e Meloidogyne javanica em soja. Sci Agric. 1995;52(2):305-9. doi:10.1590/S0103-90161995000200017

15. Pang W, Hafez SL, Sundararaj P. Concomitant interaction of Pratylenchus penetrans and Meloidogyne hapla on onion. Nematropica. 2009;39(2):297-303.

16. Carneiro RMDG, Almeida MRA. Técnica de eletroforese usada no estudo de enzimas dos nematoides de galhas para identificação de espécies. Nematol Bras. 2001;25(1):35-44.

17. Hussey RS, Barker KR. A comparison of methods of collecting inocula of Meloidogyne spp., including a new technique. Plant Dis Rep. 1973;57:1025-8.

18. Castillo P, Vovlas N. Pratylenchus (Nematoda: Pratylenchidae): diagnosis, biology, pathogenicity and management. Leiden: Brill; 2007. doi:10.1163/ej.9789004155640.i-523

19. Jenkins WR. A rapid centrifugal-flotation technique for separating nematodes from soil. Plant Dis Rep. 1964;48(1):692-5.

20. Bonetti JIS, Ferraz S. Modificações do método de Hussey & Barker para extração de ovos de Meloidogyne exigua em raízes de cafeeiro. Fitopatol Bras. 1981;6(3):553.

21. Oostenbrink M. Major characteristics of relation between nematodes and plants. Meded Landbouwhogesch Wageningen. 1966;66(4):1-46.

22. Chaves A, Maranhão SR, Pedrosa EM, Guimarães LM, Oliveira MKDS. Incidência de Meloidogyne spp. e Pratylenchus zeae em cana-de-açúcar no estado de Pernambuco, Brasil. Nematol Bras. 2009;33(4):278-80.

23. Silva AP, Pedrosa EMR, Chaves A, Maranhão SRVL, Guimarães LMP, Rolim MM. Reação de variedades de cana-de-açúcar ao parasitismo de Meloidogyne incognita e M. enterolobii. Rev Bras Cienc Agrar. 2012;7(Suppl):814-9. doi:10.5039/agraria.v7isa2276

24. Bendezu IF, Starr JL. Mechanism of resistance to Meloidogyne arenaria in the peanut genotype COAN. J Nematol. 2003;35(1):115-8.

25. Thomazelli GS, Vidal RL, Vizentini LR, Nascimento DD, Soares RS, Mammana AF, et al. Immunity of sugarcane cultivars to Meloidogyne enterolobii. Biosci J. 2020;36(6):1984-9. doi:10.14393/BJ-v36n6a2020-47972

26. Niño NE, Arbeláez G, Navarro R. Efecto de diferentes densidades poblacionales de Meloidogyne hapla sobre uchuva (Physalis peruviana L.) en invernadero. Agron Colomb. 2008;26(1):58-67.

27. Estores RA, Chen TA. Interactions of Pratylenchus penetrans and Meloidogyne incognita as coinhabitants in tomato. J Nematol. 1972;4:170-4.

28. Lo LC, Weiergang I, Bonham C, Hipsking J, Wood K, Nicholson RL. Phytoalexin accumulation in sorghum: identification of a methyl ether of luteolinidin. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol. 1996;49(1):21-31. doi:10.1006/pmpp.1996.0036

29. Garcion C, Lamotte O, Métraux JP. Mechanisms of defence to pathogens: biochemistry and physiology. In: Walters D, Newton A, Lyon G, editors. Induced resistance for plant defence: a sustainable approach to crop protection. Oxford: Blackwell; 2007. p. 109-32.

30. Noronha MA, Muniz MFS, Cruz MM, Assunção MC, Castro JMC, Oliveira ERL, et al. Meloidogyne and Pratylenchus species in sugarcane fields in the state of Alagoas, Brazil. Cienc Rural. 2017;47(2):1-3. doi:10.1590/0103-8478cr20151402

31. Herman M, Hussey RS, Boerma HR. Interactions between Meloidogyne incognita and Pratylenchus brachyurus on soybean. J Nematol. 1988;20(1):79-84.

32. Shurtleff MC, Averre CW III. Diagnosing plant diseases caused by nematodes. St. Paul: APS Press; 2000.

33. Zunke U. Observations on the invasion and endoparasitic behavior of the root lesion nematode Pratylenchus penetrans. J Nematol. 1990;22(3):309-20.

34. Moura RM, Pedrosa EMR, Maranhão SRVL, Macedo MEA, Moura AM, Silva EG, et al. Ocorrência dos fitonematoides Pratylenchus zeae e Meloidogyne spp. em cana-de-açúcar no Nordeste do Brasil. Fitopatol Bras. 2000;25:101-3.

35. Macedo N, Macedo D, Campos M, Novaretti WRT, Ferraz LCCB. Manejo de pragas e nematoides. In: Santos F, Borém A, Caldas C, editors. Cana-de-açúcar: bioenergia, açúcar e álcool: tecnologias e perspectivas. 2nd ed. Viçosa: Editora UFV; 2009. p. 119-59.

36. Viglierchio DR. Response of Pinus ponderosa seedlings to stylet-bearing nematodes. J Nematol. 1979;11(4):377-87.

37. Silva MS, Bandeira MA, Maranhão SRVL, Carvalho RM, Pedrosa EMR. Comportamento de genótipos RB de cana-de-açúcar ao parasitismo dos nematoides das galhas. Rev Bras Cienc Agrar. 2016;11(2):73-9. doi:10.5039/agraria.v11i2a5368

Downloads

Published

2026-09-18

How to Cite

Leite, R. R., Leitão, D. A. H. de S., Pedrosa, E. M. R., Brum, D. de, & Guimarães, L. M. P. (2026). Interaction among Meloidogyne incognita and M. enterolobii with Pratylenchus zeae in Sugarcane. Revista Ceres, 73, e73019. Retrieved from https://ojs.ceres.ufv.br/ceres/article/view/8247

Issue

Section

PLANT HEALTH, PLANT PROTECTION, INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT, AND BIOLOGICAL CONTROL