Tolerance of cowpea cultivars to pre-emergence application of sulfentrazone
Palabras clave:
Vigna unguiculata, selective residual herbicide, weed control, pre-emergence, phytotoxicityResumen
Improved methods of weed control are required to support expansion of large-scale cowpea cultivation in mid-west Brazil. With the aim of testing our hypothesis that the tolerance of cowpea cultivars to sulfentrazone is dose- and genotype-dependent, we assessed the effects of increasing doses (0, 250, 500 and 1,000 g ha-1 of sulfentrazone) on the cultivars BRS Imponente, BRS Novaera, BRS Tumucumaque and BRS Itaim. The phytotoxic effects of sulfentrazone varied according to the dose of herbicide applied, although the symptoms were mild and only observable at the initial stages of development and at the highest dose tested. No statistically significant interactions were detected between cultivars and doses, and there were no significant differences between doses regarding population density, plant height, yield components and grain yield. Our results demonstrate that sulfentrazone is highly selective and can be applied to the studied cultivars without affecting growth or yield.
Citas
Almeida FS, Mingotte FLC, Lemos LB & Santana MJ (2017) Agronomic performance of cowpea cultivars depending on sowing seasons in the Cerrado biome. Revista Caatinga, 30:361-369.
Alvares CA, Stape JL, Sentelhas PC, Goncalves JLM & Sparovek G (2013) Köppen’s climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorologische Zeitschrift, 22:1-18.
Araújo JPP, Rios GP, Watt EE, Neves BP, Fageria NK, Oliveira IP, Guimarães CM & Silveira FIL (1984) Cultura do caupi, Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.: descrição e recomendações técnicas de cultivo. Goiânia, Embrapa/CNPAF. 82p. (Circular Técnica, 18).
Bezerra AAC, Neves AC, Alcântara Neto F & Silva Júnior JV (2014) Morfofisiologia e produção de feijão-caupi, cultivar BRS Nova Era, em função da densidade de plantas. Revista Caatinga, 27:135-141.
Burgos NR, Brandenberger L, Wells L, Motes D, Morelock TE, Eaton S, Martin L, Bullington J, Baquireza C & Shivrain V (2007) Tolerance of cowpea to halosulfuron and sulfentrazone. Hortscience, 42:449-449.
Cardoso MJ, Bastos EA, Sobrinho CA & Melo FB (2017) Agronomic performance of ‘BRS’ Itaim cowpea beans at different planting densities under no-tillage and conventional systems. Revista Ciência Agronômica, 48:856-861.
Corrêa MJP, Alves GL, Rocha LGF & Silva MRM (2015) Períodos de interferência de plantas daninhas na cultura do feijão caupi. Revista de Ciências Agroambientais, 13:50-56.
Costa AF, Vale LS, Oliveira AB, Neto JFB & Cardoso GD (2017) Selectivity of pre-and post-emergent herbicides for cowpea (Vigna unguiculata). African Journal of Agricultural Research, 12:881-887.
Dayan FE, Weete JD, Duke SO & Hancock HG (1997) Soybean (Glycine max) cultivar differences in response to sulfentrazone. Weed Science, 45:634-641.
EMBRAPA (2016) BRS Imponente: cultivo precoce e mecanizado e grãos extra grandes são os diferenciais da cultivar. Available at: http://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/144701/1/FeijaoCaupiBRSImponente2016.pdf. Accessed on: November 15th, 2018.
EMBRAPA (2017) Sistemas de Produção - Cultivo de feijão-caupi. Available at: https://www.spo.cnptia.embrapa.br/conteudop_p_id=conteudoportlet_WAR_sistemasdeproducaolf6_1ga1ceportlet&p_p_lifecycle=0&p_p_state=normal&p_p_mode=view&p_p_col_id=column-1&p_p_col_count=1&p_r_p_-76293187_sistemaProducaoId=9109&p_r_p_-996514994_topicoId=10505. Accessed on: January 6th, 2020.
EWRC (1964) Report of the 3rd and 4th Meetings of EWRC Committee of Methods in Weed Research. Weed Research, 4:88.
Ferrell JA, Witt WW & Vencill WK (2003) Sulfentrazone absorption by plant roots increases as soil or solution pH decreases. Weed Science, 51:826-830.
Fontes JRA, Oliveira I & Gonçalves JRP (2013) Seletividade e eficácia de herbicidas para cultura do feijão-caupi. Revista Brasileira de Herbicidas, 12:47-55.
Freire-Filho F (2011) Feijão-caupi no Brasil: Produção, melhoramento genético, avanços e desafios. Teresina, Embrapa MeioNorte. 84p.
Freitas FCL, Medeiros VFLP, Grangeiro LC, Silva MGO, Nascimento PGML & Nunes GH (2009) Interferência de plantas daninhas na cultura do feijão-caupi. Planta Daninha, 27:241-247.
Grey TL, Walker RH & Hancock HG (1997) Sulfentrazone adsorption and mobility as affected by soil and pH. Weed Science, 45:733-738.
Grey TL, Walker RH, Wehtje GR, Adams J, Dayan FE, Weete JD, Hancock HG & Kwon O (2000) Behavior of sulfentrazone in ionic exchange resins, electrophoresis gels, and cation saturated soils. Weed Science, 48:239-247.
Hao GF, Zuo Y, Yang SG & Yang GF (2011) Protoporphyrinogen oxidase inhibitor: an ideal target for herbicide discovery. Chimia, 65:961-969.
Ikeda FS & Vivian R (2012) Levantamento fitossociológico de plantas daninhas na cultura de feijão-caupi em sucessão ao cultivo da soja RR. In: XXVIII Congresso Brasileiro da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas, Campo Grande. Anais, SBCPD. p.688-690.
Li Z, Wehtje GR & Walker RH (2000) Physiological basis for the differential tolerance of Glycine max to sulfentrazone during seed germination. Weed Science, 48:281-285.
Melo CAD, Medeiros WN, Santos LTD, Ferreira FA, Ferreira GL, Paes FASV & Reis MR (2010) Efeito residual de sulfentrazone, isoxaflutole e oxyfluorfen em três solos. Planta Daninha, 28:835-842.
Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento (2009) Regras para análises de sementes. Available at: http://www.agricultura.gov.br/assuntos/insumos-agropecuarios/arquivospublicacoes insumos/2946 regras_analise_sementes.pdf. Accessed on: January 6th, 2020.
Ohmes GA & Mueller TC (2007) Sulfentrazone adsorption and mobility in surface soil of the Southern United States. Weed Technology, 21:796-800.
Oliveira OMS, Silva JF, Gonçalves JRP & Klehm CS (2010) Período de convivência das plantas daninhas com cultivares de feijão-caupi em várzea no Amazonas. Planta Daninha, 28:523-530.
Rizzardi MA, Vargas L, Roman ES & Kissmann K (2008) Aspectos gerais do manejo e controle de plantas daninhas. In: Vargas L & Roman ES (Ed.) Manual de manejo e controle de plantas daninhas. Passo Fundo, Embrapa Trigo. p.107-131.
Rodrigues BN & Almeida FS (2018) Guia de herbicidas. 7th ed. Londrina, Produção Independente. 764p.
Santos HG, Jacomine PKT, Anjos LHC, Oliveira VA, Lumbreras JF, Coelho MR, Almeida JA, Araujo Filho JC, Oliveira JB & Cunha TJF (2018) Sistema Brasileiro de Classificação de Solos. 5th ed. Brasília, Embrapa. 356p.
Seplan - Secretaria de Estado de Planejamento e Coordenação Geral (2011) Atlas de Mato Grosso: abordagem socioeconômica. Cuiabá, Entrelinhas. 96p.
Souza VB, Carvalho AJ, Damasceno-Silva KJ, Rocha MM, Lacerda ML & Pereira Filho IA (2018) Agronomic performance of cowpea elite lines in the states of Minas Gerais and Mato Grosso, Brazil. Revista Caatinga, 31:90-98.
Swantek JM, Sneller CH & Oliver LR (1998) Evaluation of soybean injury from sulfentrazone and inheritance of tolerance. Weed Science, 46:271-277.
Szmigielski AM, Schoenau JJ, Johnson EN, Holm FA, Sapsford KL & Liu J (2009) Development of a laboratory bioassay and effect of soil properties on sulfentrazone phytotoxicity in soil. Weed Technology, 23:486-491.
Szmigielski AM, Schoenau JJ, Johnson EN, Holm FA, Sapsford KL & Liu J (2012) Effects of soil factors on phytotoxicity and dissipation of sulfentrazone in Canadian prairie soils. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 43:896-904.
Ugbe LA, Ndaeyo NU & Enyong JF (2016) Efficacy of selected herbicides on weed control, cowpea (Vigna Unguiculata L. Walp): performance and economic returns in Akamkpa, Southeastern Nigeria. International Journal of Research in Agriculture and Forestry, 3:19-27.
