Application time affects synthetic auxins herbicides in tank-mixture with paraquat on hairy fleabane control

Autores

  • Diecson Ruy Orsolin da Silva UFSM
  • Adalin Cezar Moraes de Aguiar UFV
  • Claudir José Basso UFSM
  • Dionei Schmidt Muraro USP

Palavras-chave:

Conyza bonariensis, 2,4-D; dicamba, sequential, night application, morning application

Resumo

Conyza sp. was the first glyphosate-resistant weed in Brazil’s soybean crop. Synthetic auxin herbicides followed by paraquat has improved the hairy fleabane control, and time of day of herbicide application can affect the control efficacy. There are no studies reporting the effects of the application time of synthetic auxins in tank-mixture with paraquat, or in sequential application with paraquat at two growth stages of hairy fleabane, applied at different times of the day. The herbicides were sprayed during the morning and night. 2,4-D applied alone was more effective applied during the day, while dicamba efficiency was higher when applied at night in the rosette stage. The mixture of 2,4-D and paraquat was more efficient when applied during the night. Tall hairy fleabane were more effectively controlled by dicamba + paraquat as well as any synthetic auxin followed by paraquat. When herbicides were applied at night, efficiency was slightly higher.

Referências

Agostinetto D, Silva DRO & Vargas L (2017) Soybean yield loss and economic thresholds due to glyphosate resistant hairy fleabane interference. Arquivos do Instituto Biológico, 84:e0022017.

Al-Khatib K, Parker R & Fuerst EP (1992) Foliar absorption and translocation of dicamba from aqueous solution and dicambatreated soil deposits. Weed Technology, 6:57-61.

Carson AG & Bandeen JD (1975) Influence of ethephon on absorption and translocation of herbicides in Canada thistle. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 55:795-800.

Eubank TW, Poston DH, Nandula VK, Koger CH, Shaw DR & Reynolds DB (2008) Glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis) control using glyphosate-, paraquat-, and glufosinatebased herbicide programs. Weed Technology, 22:16-21.

Ganie ZA & Jhala AJ (2017) Interaction of 2,4-D or dicamba with glufosinate for control of glyphosate-resistant giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida L.) in glufosinate-resistant maize (Zea mays L.) Frontiers Plant Science, 8:1207.

Ganie ZA, Jugulam M & Jhala AJ (2017) Temperature influences efficacy, absorption, and translocation of 2,4-D or glyphosate in glyphosate-resistant and glyphosate-susceptible common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) and giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida). Weed Science, 65:588-60.

Johnston CR, Eure PM, Grey TL, Culpepper AS & Vencill WK (2018) Time of application influences translocation of auxinic herbicides in palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri). Weed Science, 66:04-14.

Kegode GO & Fronning BE (2005) Artemisia biennis (biennial wormwood) control is influenced by plant size and weed flora at time of herbicide application. Crop Protection, 24:915-920.

Kruger GR, Davis VM, Weller SC & Johnson WG (2010) Control of horseweed (Conyza canadensis) with growth regulator herbicides. Weed Technology, 24:425-429.

Lagator M, Vogwill T, Mead A, Colegrave N & Neve P (2013) Herbicide mixtures at high doses slow the evolution of resistance in experimentally evolving populations of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. New Phytologist, 198:938-945.

Lucio FR, Kalsing A, Adegas FS, Rossi CVS, Correia NM, Gazziero DLP & Silva AF (2019) Dispersal and frequency of glyphosateresistant and glyphosate-tolerant weeds in soybean-producing edaphoclimatic microregions in Brazil. Weed Technology, 33:217:231.

Martinson KB, Durgan BR, Gunsolus JL & Sothern RB (2005) Time of day of application effect on glyphosate and glufosinate efficacy. Crop Management, 4. doi:10.1094/CM-2005-0718-02-RS.

Martinson KB, Sothern RB, Koukkari WL, Durgan BR & Gunsolus JL (2002) Circadian response of annual weeds to glyphosate and glufosinate. Chronobiology international, 19:405-422.

Mohr K, Sellers BA & Smeda RJ (2007) Application time of day influences glyphosate efficacy. Weed Technology, 21:07-13.

Montgomery GB, Treadway JA, Reeves JL & Steckel LE (2017) Effect of time of day of application of 2,4-D, dicamba, glufosinate, paraquat, and saflufenacil on horseweed (Conyza canadensis) control. Weed Technoloy, 31:550-556.

Osipe JB, Oliveira Jr RS, Constantin J, Takano HK & Biffe DF (2017) Spectrum of weed control with 2,4-D and dicamba herbicides associated to glyphosate or not. Planta Daninha, 35:e017160815.

Ou J, Stahlman PW & Jugulam M (2018) Reduced absorption of glyphosate and decreased translocation of dicamba contribute to poor control of kochia (Kochia scoparia) at high temperature. Pest Management Science, 74:1134-1142.

Pereira LV, Carvalho LB & Dal Magro T (2016) Controle químico de buva resistente a glyphosate é mais eficaz no préflorescimento ou no rebrote? Revista Ciências Agroveterinária, 15:277-288.

Peterson MA, McMaster SA, Riechers DE, Skelton J & Stahlman PW (2016) 2,4-D Past, Present, and Future: A Review. Weed Technology, 30:303-345.

Pitelli RA, Bisigatto AT, Kawaguchi I & Pitelli RLCM (2011) Doses e horário de aplicação do diquat no controle de Eichhornia crassipes. Planta Daninha, 29:269-277.

Rai JPN & Tripathi RS (1986) Population regulation of Galinsoga ciliata (Raf.) Blake and G. parviflora Cav.: Effect of 2,4-D application at different growth stages and light regimes. Weed Research, 26:59-67.

Sellers BA, Smeda RJ & Johnson WG (2003) Diurnal fluctuations and leaf angle reduce glufosinate efficacy. Weed Technology, 17:302-306.

Skelton JJ, Simpson DM, Peterson Mark A & Riechers DE (2017) Comparative analysis of 2,4-D uptake, translocation, and metabolism in non–aad-1 transformed and 2,4-D–resistant corn. Weed Science, 65:567-578.

Song Y (2013) Insight into the mode of action of 2,4 dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4 D) as an herbicide. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 56:106-113.

Stewart CL, Nurse RE & Sikkema PH (2009) Time of day impacts postemergence weed control in corn. Weed Technology, 23:346-355.

Stopps GJ, Nurse RE & Sikkema PH (2013) The effect of time of day on the activity of postemergence soybean herbicides. Weed technology, 27:690-695.

Sunohara Y & Matsumoto H (1997) Comparative physiological effects of quinclorac and auxins, and light involvement in quinclorac-induced chlorosis in corn leaves. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 58:125-132.

Vidal RA, Kalsing A, Goulart ICGR, Lamego FP & Christoffoleti PJ (2007) Impacto da temperatura, irradiância e profundidade das sementes na emergência e germinação de Conyza bonariensis e Conyza canadensis resistentes ao glyphosate. Planta Daninha, 25:309-315.

Werth J, Walker S, Boucher L & Robinson G (2010) Applying the double knock technique to control Conyza bonariensis. Weed Biology Management, 10:01-08.

Downloads

Publicado

2025-05-16

Como Citar

Ruy Orsolin da Silva, D., Moraes de Aguiar, A. C., Basso, C. J., & Schmidt Muraro, D. (2025). Application time affects synthetic auxins herbicides in tank-mixture with paraquat on hairy fleabane control. Revista Ceres, 68(3), 194–200. Recuperado de https://ojs.ceres.ufv.br/ceres/article/view/7849

Edição

Seção

PHYSIOLOGY AND MORPHOLOGY APPLIED TO AGRICULTURE

Artigos mais lidos pelo mesmo(s) autor(es)