Avaliação de compostos de milho (Zea mays L.) duro resultantes de seleção recorrente recíproca, baseada em famílias de irmãos completos, entre os compostos originais dentado e duro
Keywords:
seleção recorrente, famílias completas, composto duro, composto dentado, milho flintAbstract
Changes in grain yield and correlated characters in the Flint composites of maize originated from different cycles and variations of the reciprocal recurrent selection based on fullsib families between the original Dent and Flint composites were evaluated. The composites were also compared with commercial hybrids in different field locations.
References
ALLARD, R.W. Princípios do melhoramento genético das plantas. São Paulo, Editora Edgard Bliicher, 1971. 381p.
COMSTOCK, R.E.; ROBINSON, H.F. & HARVEY, P.H. A breeding procedure designed to make maximum use of both general and specific combining ability. Agron. J. 41: 360-367. 1949.
DARRAH, L.L.; EBERHART, S.A. & PENNY, L.H. A maize breeding methods study in Kenya. Crop. Sci. 12:605-608. 1972.
DOUGLAS, A.G.; COLLIER, J.W.; EL-EBRASHY, M.F. & ROGERS, J8. An evaluation of three cycles of reciprocal recurrent selection in a com
improvement program. Crop Sci. 1:157-161. 1961.
EBERHART, S.A.; DEBELA, S. & HALLAUER, A.R. Reciprocal recurrent selection in the BSSS and BSCB1 maize populations and half-sib selection in BSSS. Crop Sci. 13: 451-456. 1973.
ESTEVES, A. Interação de genótipos por localidades em cruzamentos intervarietais de milho (Zea mays L.). Piracicaba-SP, ESALQ/USP, 1978. 70 p. (Te- se de Mestrado).
HALLAUER, A.R. Genetic variability for yield after four cycles of reciprocal recurrente selection in maize. Crop Sci. 10:482-485. 1970.
HALLAUER, AR. & EBERHART, S.A. Reciprocal full-sib selection. Crop Sci. 10:315-316. 1970.
LONNQUIST, J.H. Recurrent selection as a mean of modifying combining ability in corn. Agron. J. 43:311-315. 1951.
MARTIN, J.M. & HALLAUER, A R. Seven cycles of reciprocal recurrent selection in BSSS and BSCB1 maize populations. Crop Sci. 20:599-603. 1980.
MOLL, R.H. & STUBER, C.W. Comparison of responses to alternative selection procedures initiated with two populations of maize (Zea mays L.). Crop Sci. 11:706-711. 1971.
MORENO-GONZALEZ, J. & HALLAUER, A.R. Combined S2 and cross-bred family selection in full-sib reciprocal recurrent selection. Theor. Appl. Genet. 61:353-358. 1982.
PATERNIANT, E. Seleccién recurrente reciproca de maiz en familias de medio hermanos. Agron. Trop. 19:211-213. 1969.
PATERNIANI, E. & VENCOVSKY, R. Reciprocal recurrent selection in maize (Zea mays L.) based on tescrosses of half-sib families. Maydica. 22:141-152. 1977.
PATERNIANI, E. & VENCOVSKY, R. Reciprocal recurrent selection based on half-sib progenies and prolific plants in maize (Zea mays L.). Maydica. 23:209-219. 1978.
PENNY, L.H. & EBERHART, S.A. Twenty years of reciprocal recurrente selection with two synthetic varieties of maize (Zea mays L.). Crop Sci. 11:900-903. 1971.
RUSCHEL, R. Interação genótipos x localidades na região centro-sul em milho (Zea mays L). Piracicaba-SP, ESALQ/USP, 1968. 60 p. (Tese de Mestrado).
SCOTT, AJ. & KNOTT, M. A cluster analysis method for grouping means in the analysis of variance. Biometrics. 30:507-512. 1974.
SMITH, O.S. Evaluation of reciprocal selection in BSSS, and BSCB1, and BS13 maize populations. Crop Sci. 23:35-40. 1983.
STANGLAND, G.R.; RUSSEL, W.A. & SMITH, O.S. Agronomic evaluation of four maize synthetics and their crosses after recurrent selection for yield. Maydica. 27:199-212. 1982.
ZUBER, M.S. Relative efficiency of incomplete blocks designs using com uniformity trial data. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 34:30-47. 1942.
